Fri. Apr 19th, 2024

Top 10 Unsettling Facebook Facts That Will Shocke You

By Thao Pham Jan 29, 2024

Facebook has 1.2 billion users per day, making it the largest social media network in the world. The typical spooky users are present in this expansive landscape. Facebook itself would be the super-bizarre monarch if they had one. According to recent investigations, Facebook is utilizing violence to keep users interested and the business has information on people who are not using the platform. While its moderators deal with PTSD, the company also requests customers’ phone numbers, bank account information, and the date and time of their last sex.

Facebook Visible in Brain Scans

The majority of people have succumbed to the compulsive urge to constantly check their Facebook profile. Some people may even show signs of withdrawal. Scientists made the decision to investigate whether the alleged “Facebook addiction” behaved like a drug in the brain. Although the study was tiny and by no means definitive, the findings were intriguing.Twenty volunteers who provided information on their Facebook usage in 2014 were found to have a minor addiction. After that, each person pushed a button and saw visuals as their brains were scanned. Road signs and Facebook-related images alternated in the gallery. The participants were free to decide when to press the button, but when Facebook appeared, those with higher addiction survey scores became trigger happy.The brain’s strong reaction to the platform was revealed by the scans. Like cocaine addicts, the areas prone to impulsivity flared. But there was a significant distinction between Facebook addicts and drug addicts. The prefrontal brain of a cocaine user is not as active. This section of the brain, which regulates the impulsive parts, functioned flawlessly in the Facebook volunteers. In other words, a complex combination of habit, culture, and societal factors drive social media addicts instead of true needs they cannot control.

Users Are Scored on Their Reputation

On social media, it’s problematic when genuine posts are reported as fake news. Facebook created a method to identify guilty users in order to combat this. A user’s “trustworthiness” is determined by what information they flag, why they flag it, and how many times they hit that button. This score only goes from 0 to one for whatever reason.Before the system was put into use in 2018, it took a year to create. The primary goal is to locate the bullies and trolls. A lot of people report content infractions on purpose in order to feel exciting. Some people legitimately disagree with the content, but they do so out of personal taste rather than because they think the piece is flawed in some other way.
This is not an all-out fly swatter from the score. This is only one mechanism that Facebook uses to sort the real flags from the fakes, along with thousands other behavioral cues. Although this is undoubtedly a fantastic idea, it is still unclear how a user is eventually assigned a score. The way these scores are being applied is even more outrageous.

Shadow Listings

In 2018, Facebook’s founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, testified before Congress. He provided stern answers on user privacy during the sessions. Furthermore, he faced intense questioning regarding shadow profiles that amassed information on non-Facebook users. Even though this problem has been around for five years, Zuckerberg insisted he had never heard of a “shadow profile.”This function determines the social network and contact information of individuals who don’t use Facebook but have friends who do. Every mobile contact without a Facebook account gets assigned a shadow profile when these buddies submit their own phone numbers. Users who have mutual connections eventually provide the website with an idealized picture of their social circle.If someone joins Facebook with a shadow profile, Facebook will recommend friends for them based on their social network, which the business is already aware of by that point. It appears that Facebook is attempting to link users on the site in a respectable way with this approach. However, some consumers might not be happy about any business utilizing their number to create a ghost membership for them after stealing it from a friend’s phone.

Closed-caption transcripts

A handful of outside transcriptionists broke their silence in 2019. They had been employed by Facebook to transcribe recordings, the majority of which were audio exchanges between Facebook Messenger users. Given that some of the files featured language and issues that were considered filthy, the work was already peculiar. Furthermore, the massive social media platform never explained why it required so many transcriptions.The contractors came clean after smelling a rat. Facebook was forced to acknowledge that users were being surreptitiously recorded via their phone microphones, but it also stated that consent was always obtained. However, in order for anyone to use voice messaging, this consent was required—and it was buried in the fine print. Upon reviewing all of the policies, investigators were unable to locate any that allowed users to consent to having their conversations recorded and outsourced to outside transcription services. Put otherwise, even if they so desired, Facebook users could not agree.The company declared that the initiative was terminated and that Facebook’s AI for speech recognition was the only reason for the transcriptions. Whether accurate or not, this trite justification acknowledged that user privacy had been compromised.

Moderators Experience PTSD

Many users disobey Facebook’s guidelines prohibiting the publishing of inflammatory, graphic, or unlawful content. The moderators step in at this point. Their responsibility is to filter these posts. The Verge released a study on their working conditions in 2019. The original 7,500 word paper examined a Facebook moderation office in Arizona in great detail. Moderators stated in interviews that the unhappiness of the workplace was caused by the stress of seeing upsetting content, Facebook’s terrible staff policies, and the low compensation.Workers reportedly used marijuana use and sex as coping mechanisms, which resulted from “trauma bonding.” In addition to facing financial difficulties and laboring under what they called Facebook’s “cruel” regulations, moderators gave in to an overwhelming volume of offensive posts. Racism, graphic brutality, and child abuse and exploitation were among them. Some moderators lost it and started experiencing PTSD symptoms, while others were paranoid due to the constant conspiracy ideas they were reading.

The Witch Hunt in Brazil

A tabloid published a drawing on Facebook in 2014. According to the post, the woman in the photo kidnapped kids and used their organs for witchcraft. Many came to the conclusion that Fabiane Maria de Jesus was “shown” in the picture. The 33-year-old Brazilian woman was therefore attacked by a mob.The unconscious woman’s head was shown being bashed against the ground in a violent video. The audience applauded as she was dragged through the streets while being tied to a bicycle. Fabiane was exonerated by the Military Police of any offenses pertaining to organ trafficking, black magic, or kidnapping. In relation to the mob violence, a number of persons were also taken into custody. All of this did not, however, assist the victim. She suffered so much abuse that she passed away after two days.Facebook retorted that it had done nothing illegal and had taken no ownership of the murder. However, Facebook’s lack of awareness about Brazil’s fear of organ theft and witchcraft may have been the catalyst for the attack. These are genuine problems, particularly for the less fortunate areas. Facebook reviewers approved the message despite the fact that it appeared to be benign, but given its readership, it was actually a tragic cultural trigger.

FBI Utilizes Facebook to Hire Spies

Facebook surveillance ads were posted by the FBI, according to a Business Insider article from 2019. As stated in the platform’s Ad Library, the three advertisements were activated on September 11. The FBI was transparent about its intentions, even with the cloak and dagger theme and the lucky date. They were preparing the way for Russian spies.One can click on the picture whenever they want to give Putin the finger. The advertisement takes the would-be spy to a different website. The FBI’s Washington Field Office Counterintelligence Program is in charge of this page. The reader is informed in both Russian and English that the US employs foreign intelligence on other countries to safeguard its own nationals. The FBI is offering in-person meetings to anyone with pertinent information. Although this might sound like a bizarre notion, 99 percent of Russian spies just walk into the relevant building and begin to divulge information. The Bureau would only say that the large number of active soviet operatives constituted a security danger in response to questions about why they targeted the Russians.

Facebook Tracks Periods And Sexual Behavior

Watchdog group Privacy International is situated in Britain. It was found in 2019 that Facebook had an unsettling tendency of tracking women’s menstrual cycles and the date of their most recent sex. Naturally, none of the women in question revealed anything on social media or offered the information. They trusted two period-tracking apps, which was a mistake.Users, going by the names Maya and MIA Fem, inputted data to control their health, take birth control, and even aid in their own conception. However, these facts were shared by the two apps with Facebook and other third parties without consent. To put it another way, these outside parties were aware of the women’s last sex experience, menstrual cycle, and method of birth control.The moment a user installed and launched the tracker, the apps began collecting data—even before any privacy agreements were accepted. The Facebook Software Development Kit, a tool connected to the platform’s network of advertisements, relayed the data.Unauthorized disclosure of personal information has the potential to be fatal. Experts fear that businesses and insurance providers may exploit the data to discriminate against women by denying them leadership positions and raising their premiums. Who knows why Facebook likes periods?

An Attempt To Take Bank Information

Facebook flirted with a few banks in 2018. They were requested by the business to provide the financial data of their customers. Facebook specifically wanted to see what users were buying with their credit cards and how much money was in their accounts. The story was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, which also mentioned a few of the banks Facebook contacted. Among them were Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo.Banks would receive Messenger app features in exchange for providing the financial data. This was alluring. PayPal and other corporations pose a serious threat to banks. With over a billion users, Messenger is both Facebook’s hub for commerce and a huge market. The banks would gain an advantage over their rivals if the app encouraged customers to utilize them.When credit is due, give it. Facebook pushed a tempting offer over the table, but up until now, every bank had responded, “No, thank you.” Even though they had promised not to misuse the information, one bank flatly refused, fearing for the privacy of its consumers. Facebook’s poor privacy record, though, makes it difficult to trust. The least appealing aspect of all is the notion that its employees would scrutinize each item or service you have just paid for with a credit card.

Facebook Makes Money Off Violent Violence

A journalist sought to be a Facebook moderator in 2018. The reporter started working for CPL Resources, a corporation located in Dublin. Since 2010, this contractor has been employed by Facebook. In order to acquire information for the Channel 4 program “Inside Facebook: Secrets of the Social Network,” the undercover investigator went undercover.CPL’s training was based on the community standards of Facebook. It did not take long to realize that not all abuse was the same. It was instructed to the fictitious employee to permit some offensive posts. The training officer went on to give two instances. One included actual video of an adult man beating a toddler. Even after being reported as improper in 2012, the video continued to circulate on Facebook. Another had a meme that read, “when your daughter’s first crush is a little negro boy,” while depicting a small girl drowning. Facebook claimed both ought to have been removed after Channel 4 brought it to their notice.It’s hard to believe that two offensive posts made their way past the selection process to become instructional materials. In fact, despite Facebook’s protestations that users weren’t being tricked into using violence to increase their user base and earn more money from ads, a CPL trainer informed the writer that excessive censorship causes users to lose interest in the platform. After all, it’s all about the bottom line.

Related Post

41 thoughts on “Top 10 Unsettling Facebook Facts That Will Shocke You”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *